Approval-first email & calendar layer

Control the conversations
that run your business.

Sentra reads your important threads, surfaces the right next step, and lets you approve, edit, or reject. Nothing is sent, booked, or scheduled without your explicit decision.

Currently in validation with operational founders across Italy and Europe.

Try it

This is how Sentra feels.

Below is a real Proposal Card. Click Approve, Edit, or Reject to see what happens.

Re: Follow-up — Partnership proposal with Marco Rossi

From: marco.rossi@example.comToday, 9:42 AM
Sentra Summary

Marco followed up after last week's intro call. He's asking about timeline and next steps. Tone is warm, moderate urgency.

Recommended Action

Reply confirming interest and propose two time slots for a 30-minute call this week.

Draft Reply
Hi Marco, thanks for following up. We're aligned and ready to move forward. I'm proposing two slots for a quick call this week: Wednesday 3 PM or Thursday 11 AM (CET). Let me know what works.
Confidence: High
Missing info: None
The full picture

And this is your full day, organized.

From a single proposal to the complete cockpit — see how Sentra holds your inbox together.

Inside Gmail
S
Sentra
Caught up on your inbox · 2 minutes ago
09:14

Good morning, Mattia.

I went through the 47 emails that came in overnight. I set 14 aside — promos and newsletters, nothing important. Here are six that need you, sorted by type.

This morning you've already approved 2, edited 1 and rejected nothing. Good pace.
S
RegardingPietro Chiodahigh certainty

Pietro confirmed availability for Thursday morning. You'd suggested 10:00, and your calendar is still clear. Better to lock it in before it fills up.

I can create the event for you
Google Meet · invite to Pietro
Thursday, May 21
10:00–10:30
S
RegardingAlessandro Verdimedium certainty

Alessandro asks to move Monday's call. He's free Tuesday from 14:00. You have something at 14:30, so I'm proposing 14:00–14:25 — leaves a five-minute buffer.

I'll replace the event on May 24
Invite to Alessandro · same Meet
Tuesday, May 25
14:00–14:25
S
RegardingLaura Bianchihigh certainty

Laura has been waiting for two days. She's asking to confirm contract terms and when she can get the updated quote. I've drafted a reply in your tone — just verify one thing.

Draft reply
From Mattia to Laura Bianchi

Hi Laura, thanks for your patience. Confirming the revised terms: they work for us. I'll send the updated quote by end of day tomorrow. Talk soon, Mattia

One thing: is the updated quote really ready for tomorrow? If not, change the date before sending.
S
RegardingSofia Romanomedium certainty

Sofia (board) is asking whether you're holding the Q3 guidance. She's been waiting four hours — not critical yet, but a short reply costs little and reassures the people who matter.

Draft reply
From Mattia to Sofia Romano

Hi Sofia, I'm holding Q3 guidance — actually, we're slightly above forecast on two metrics. I'll send you the full update Monday morning. Talk soon, Mattia

Check: are November numbers consolidated? If not, the "Monday" promise becomes risky.
S
RegardingMarco Ferri−4 dayshigh certainty

You promised Marco the onboarding docs four days ago. It's slipping down the thread — better to close this today before it cools off.

Draft follow-up
With light apology — your tone

Hi Marco, sorry for the delay. Attaching the onboarding docs now. Let me know if you need anything else to get started. Thanks, Mattia

S
RegardingAnna Greco−6 dayslow certainty

You promised Anna the demo recap six days ago. The relationship is in a delicate phase — the longer you wait, the more it costs. A short apology and a follow-through, but check that the tone is personal enough.

Draft follow-up
+ short call proposal

Hi Anna, sorry for the long delay — attaching the demo recap as promised. If you're up for it, let's catch up for 15 minutes this week on next steps. Mattia

The Problem

Important conversations don't manage themselves.

Founders and operational executives spend hours navigating threads that should take minutes — without the confidence that nothing slips.

Speed without control isn't a real option

Generic AI tools act before you decide. Faster, yes — but you lose visibility on what was actually said and committed in your name.

Follow-ups slip through the cracks

Important commitments live inside threads no one revisits. Until it's too late and the relationship is the one that pays.

Scheduling turns into ping-pong

Back-and-forth coordination eats hours that should go to execution. And often a single missed reply restarts the whole loop.

How it works

Three steps. Full control.

01

Connect

Link your Gmail and calendar. Sentra reads your threads and learns which conversations matter.

02

Sentra proposes

For every important thread, Sentra surfaces a Proposal Card — not an auto-reply. A clear next step, a draft, a scheduling option, with full context and a confidence signal.

03

You decide

Review the proposal. Approve it, edit it, or reject it. Nothing happens without your explicit action. Always.

See Sentra in action

Thread → Proposal → Decision. In 25 seconds.

Watch how Sentra turns an important email into a clear next step you can approve, edit, or reject.

Features

Built for control, not convenience.

Thread Intelligence

Sentra reads the full context of a conversation — not just the last message. It identifies what's needed, what's at risk, and what the right next step is.

Approval-first by Design

Every action — reply, booking, follow-up — requires your explicit Approve. Not a toggle. Not a setting. A structural guarantee.

Proposal Cards

Each Proposal Card shows: summary, recommended action, suggested draft, missing context, and a confidence signal. Everything you need to decide in seconds.

Follow-up Ledger

Sentra tracks every commitment made in your threads. Promises you made. Promises made to you. Nothing disappears.

Safe Scheduling

Scheduling proposals respect your calendar rules, buffer times, VIP handling, and "never book" windows. No surprises.

Audit Trail

Every decision — Approved, Edited, Rejected — is logged. You always know what happened, when, and why.

How we compare

Not another AI email tool.

 SentraSuperhumanFyxer AIGoogle GeminiHuman EA
Approval-first governanceNot structural
Nothing sent without approvalTrust-based
Proposal Cards with contextPartialPartial
Follow-up trackingPartial
Personal memory (VIPs, style)Partial
Audit trail
Cost€50/mo~€30/mo~€50/moFree with Workspace€2,000+/mo
Available 24/7
Design Partner program

Shape Sentra from the ground up.

We're working with a small group of operational founders who want to build the next standard for email and calendar governance. Design Partners get early access, direct influence on the product, and terms that won't be available again.

  • Early access to Sentra before public launch
  • 50% off for your first 6 months (€50/month reference price)
  • Direct line to founders — your workflow shapes the product
  • Full refund if Sentra does not pass validation
  • Founding member status and recognition
€69
one-time commitment fee
Become a Design Partner

The €69 fee is a commitment signal, not a subscription. Fully refundable if Sentra does not pass validation.

Stop reacting.
Start governing.

Join the first cohort of design partners shaping how operational founders run their inbox.

Become a Design Partner →
Built by founders, for founders

Who's behind Sentra.

Sentra is built by two operators who've lived the problem. Not a faceless AI startup.

Mattia Riccò

Founder & CEO

Building Sentra to give operational founders the speed they need — without the loss of control they can't afford.

Connect on LinkedIn →

Pietro Chioda

Co-Founder & CTO

Engineer and co-founder. Building the infrastructure that makes approval-first email actually work at scale.

LinkedIn profile coming soon

Frequently asked questions.

It's a commitment signal. We use it to filter founders who are serious about improving their email and calendar workflow — not casual interest. It's fully refundable if Sentra does not pass validation.